The Sharing House (Melbourne) *(closed)

Mirroring the Harry Potter book series, it is popular, meandering, unfinished, plasticised novelty that leaves no lasting impression.

Our experience

The Sharing House – the frontage

If one views Melbourne as an amoebic organism with the CBD as its rightful nucleus, the Docklands precinct is a pseudopod and South Wharf its newest embryonic offspring. Both are partly formed, yet vibrating with potential life. Edging the midnight black waters of the Yarra River, The Sharing House is arguably the mitochondria of the South Wharf precinct. Consistently beaming bright and loudly buzzing from within  a gleaming glass frontage and posterior, it possesses none of that moody black or grunge disposition favoured by far too many Melbourne restaurants of late. Instead, between a partly-opened kitchen and a distracting Lego-brick bar, a large space is bathed in striking natural light during the day or bright downlights at night. Friends and couples, students and corporates, and the odd senior citizen and the toddler make up The Sharing House’s inter-generational dining crowd.

The Sharing House – the setting

MoMo & Coco visited twice, on both occasions for an after-work dinner. The eating-style of The Sharing House may be found in its name — small-plate, shared plates. Reflecting a Modern Australian-European sensibility, they were listed in a menu clearly designed by an individual of an untidy mind. With no logical sequencing, whether by price nor size, it was a detracting annoyance. We started with the curious Rabbit & Cauliflower Popcorn ($12) that arrived in a paper bag hugging a fistful of non-greasy nuggets. It was the personification of The Sharing House, lots of fun but…

The Sharing House – the waterfront setting

Next were two mini-Pizzas, a porcini and thyme ($13) and a jamon & mozzarella ($12), good but…small. For that price, we would recommend you bypass it for a more generously-proportioned one at Ladro, I Carusi or +39. This was followed by an assortment of pretty, painterly Salads ($8-$13), and a Duck l’orange ($24), tender with contrasting texture from potatoes, but.. suffocating under a very sweet essence. The highlight of the savouries was the Ocean trout gravlax ($12), vibrant in appearance and flavour, thin slivers of trout embellished with beads of apple and dots of mustard creme fraiche. It qualified as one of our favourite savoury dishes of the year.

The Sharing House offered 6 types of desserts, of which we bypassed the sampling rack of miniature ice cream cones and a selection of so-called “afternoon tea” tidbits. The two desserts which will guarantee our return to The Sharing House, we shall detail first here. The first irresistible is the “Chocolate Delice” ($12), a log of milk chocolate mousse intermingling with a sweep of caramel and set on a base of pop rocks that follow that theme of playful novelty. It came partnered with a dollop of plain ice cream. Alongside a pop rock dessert at Henry & The Fox, MoMo & Coco are inclined to speculate a pop-rock dessert trend. 😛

The second irresistible from The Sharing House which MoMo & Coco loved was the “Chocolate Jaffa Fondant” ($14), a splendid carnival of sugar and colour. Four well-formed mini chocolate fondants danced between squares of fruity jubes and wheels of citrus. A dessert to make anyone smile.

Less successful were two other desserts that we sampled. The deconstructed “Treacle Tart” ($12) was more crumbed cake cubes than tart, of which the stubs were dry in texture and masked in flavour, crowned with discs of something sweet and dabbling swoops of cream. Just plain sugar really.

Similarly, the “Sticky Date” ($14) came presented as a swiss roll filled with date puree. It was again, imbued with dryness and a bare murmur of flavour. The sole positive aspect was the pedro ximinez ice cream.

The Sharing House – playful novelty

Long-time readers of this dessert blog will recognise that we have very exacting expectations of restaurant service. Over two visits to The Sharing House however, there were no technical faults to note. Can it be, you might ask? Partly yes. The staff were clearly well-organised, there was a designated waiter per table. Our designated water promptly took orders, promptly delivered orders with succinct explanations, promptly refilled wine and water glasses, never hurried us out and on, only delivered the bill when summoned to do so. It sounds simple, The Sharing House did it. We wonder why other Melbourne restaurants seem unable to execute as smoothly. That said, it would have been nice to be farewelled with as bright a smile as when we were greeted…after all, we did just pay.

Our verdict

The Sharing House – playful novelty

How does a book become a classic? Is it because of the author? No, no author of an enduring work relies on their perceived fame. Celebrity is transient, hype is illusory. The final version that hits the bookstands is not the author’s product alone. Yes, the author gives expression to his idea by crafting a strong plot, well-developed characters, a clear and lyrical prose. But it is the editor who gives the book the final polish, cutting this out, chopping that away. An editor with a keen eye is what The Sharing House needs. Re-organise that cluttered menu. Excise those average dishes, especially those desserts. Show us a good ending. An impersonal Kevin-Rudd look-alike Lego man that came with the bill summed up The Sharing House — plasticised playful novelty. MoMo & Coco like The Sharing House, but we really ought to have loved it. It has got the backbone of a splendid, versatile venue and offers a generally high standard of service. For want of a better analogy, the food offerings however mirrors the Harry Potter book series. Evidently popular, initially interesting, increasingly of a meandering character, finishing unfinished. Playful novelty that leaves no lasting impression.

Dessert adventure checklist

  1. Dessert destination: The Sharing House, 35 Dukes Walk, South Wharf, Melbourne CBD, Vic 3006.
  2. Budget: $$ -$$$.
  3. Sweet irresistibles: Restaurant dessert. Modern Australian/European.
  4. Must-eat: The “Chocolate Jaffa Fondant.”
  5. The short and sweet story: Mirroring the Harry Potter book series, it is popular, meandering, unfinished, plasticised novelty that leaves no lasting impression.

The Sharing House on Urbanspoon



  1. My partner and I had such a great night here at the Sharing House 🙂 YUM ~ loved all their desserts hehe YAY!

    • Hi Daisy – thanks for your comment. Really, you loved all their desserts? We didn’t at all…per our review above, we found The Sharing House a bit inconsistent. Perhaps we are becoming more fussy, oh dear. If you have any dessert recommendations, don’t hesitate to let us know. Thank you for your continued readership ~ MoMo & Coco.

      • Oh i’m really surprised that you didn’t like any of their desserts 😦 because I really liked their Chocolate delice ~ i thought the little ice-cream scoops were nice too but I didn’t like some of their flavours. Maybe because they’re still new that’s why they have inconsistencies.

        Have you tried Henry and the Fox? Their Passionfruit Cheesecake is quite nice 🙂

      • Ergh…no, I believe our review stated our liking for some of The Sharing House’s desserts, specifically the Chocolate Delice and Fondant. Perhaps your two choices were the better ones. We had sampled most of the dessert menu and as detailed above, the rest, savouries included, were rather average.

        Yes, we have tried Henry & The Fox, we were one of the first reviewers to review it, and we have been back a number of times since. Our review is here. It’s been open for half a year now, relatively new, but exceedingly and consistently good. Hope that clarifies ~ MoMo & Coco.

  2. Hi Momo & Coco, I was there last night and the menu is very easy to follow and organised according to size and share ability, loved it all. Cocktails and beers to share as well. I can’t think of one restaurant I have ever been to which does not have at least one or two items that I don’t like, it’s all a matter of taste really!

    • Hi Meowmeow – thank you for your comment. Our last visit was in early June, so perhaps The Sharing House must have changed their menu layout since. A quick peek at their website indicates this, but the menu content itself does not seem to have changed much. Indeed, most of the dishes we had on our visits still remain. As to your further comments, not sure how cocktails/beers can be shared…. Anyhow, ff course, we agree with you that every restaurant has a few dishes that aren’t good, but taste is one thing and execution quite another. For example, we personally hate mousse-cakes and macarons, but we can recognise what constitutes a good mousse-cake and macaron. As per our review, we found some of The Sharing House’ dishes good, most of the others unimpressive — great names, bland flavours. Thank you regardless of your diverging opinion for sharing your thoughts, and for your readership ~ MoMo & Coco.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s